tobit david
Differences
The differences between two versions are shown here.
| Both sides of the previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| tobit_david [2016/12/28 17:02] – lwsystems | tobit_david [2016/12/28 17:02] (current) – [Hinweise] lwsystems | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| There are two points to consider with this type of connection. | There are two points to consider with this type of connection. | ||
| - | #The emails in the DupLOG mailbox are only references. If the actual email is deleted, the email in the DupLOG mailbox will be empty. | + | The emails in the DupLOG mailbox are only references. If the actual email is deleted, the email in the DupLOG mailbox will be empty. |
| - | #The DupLOG mechanism intervenes very early in the mail processing process, so the spam criterion is not yet taken into account. | + | |
| + | The DupLOG mechanism intervenes very early in the mail processing process, so the spam criterion is not yet taken into account. | ||
| Unfortunately, Tobit David does not provide a more robust interface for accessing all incoming and outgoing emails. Therefore, access should be performed relatively frequently. | Unfortunately, Tobit David does not provide a more robust interface for accessing all incoming and outgoing emails. Therefore, access should be performed relatively frequently. | ||
tobit_david.1482944547.txt.gz Last modified: 2016/12/28 17:02 by lwsystems
Page Tools
